PurePC.pl - Forum Dyskusyjne: Ati Radeon HD3850/3870 - PurePC.pl - Forum Dyskusyjne

i widać, ze użyli modułów 64MB, a nie jak 2900XT 32MB

z niecierpliwością czekam na premierę tych kart może AMD odkuje się na nvidia tak jak to było przy premierze X1900 ta karta rozgromiła wtedy nvidie

Tjaa Ciekawe z kórej strony

Bądźmy poważni.... Nie dosc że nie wygrywa we wszystkich testach to jeśli wygrywa to róznice są niewielkie a co najważniejsze to tam jest porównanie do GF7800GTX 512MB a nie do GF7900GTX który jest szybszy I gdzie ten pogrom?? Owszem - Radek x1900xtx jest szybszy od GF7900GTX nawet ale róznice na jego korzysc są niewielkie a i to nie zawsze....

Domell bądźmy poważni , z czasem te różnice wyraźne wzrosły, coś jak to jest z 7900GS/X1950PRO.

Są już jakieś przecieki testów oprócz wynika w Smarku06 tego rv670?

Domell bądźmy poważni , z czasem te różnice wyraźne wzrosły, coś jak to jest z 7900GS/X1950PRO.

Są już jakieś przecieki testów oprócz wynika w Smarku06 tego rv670?

No własnie - Bądźmy poważni.... Fakt w kilku tytułach Radek x1900xtx może i osiąga dosc wyraxną przewagę nad GF7900GTX ale i tak nie zmienia to faktu że w zdecydowanej większosci gier te róznice na korzysc karty ATI są niewielkie a i nie zawsze są.... To samo tyczy się GF7900GS/Radka x1950Pro

Co do wyników rv670 to ponoć w 1600x1200 w 3D marku 06 osiąga blisko 8k pkt na C2Q6600....

Tak Domell z tym że ta zdecydowana większość to zwykle stare gry a te kilka to nowe....

Bądźmy poważni....

no wlasnie. badzmy powazni i nie przytaczajmy testow z pcl

a co do "poprawek" w rv670 (jezeli to nie fake) to z jedenj strony potwierdzaja, ze jednak tutaj jest glowny problem i to nie jest kwestia software/sterow, a z drugiej, bardzo milo, ze beda probowac to naprawic. co im z tego wyjdzie jest bardzo ciekaw.

This all leads up to AMD’s RV670. What was initially thought to be just a midrange chip is looking to turn out to be much, much more. This 55 nm new chip from AMD contains all of the primary functional units of the older R600. This means 320 stream processors, 1024 bit ringbus, and what looks to be the same amount of RBEs and texture/filtering units. A big change is that the chip will “only” feature a 256 bit bus, like its competition from NVIDIA. Memory bandwidth may not really be a problem though, as faster GDDR-4 is already available. It may not be the 512 bit bus that the R600 had, but that in all honesty seemed like overkill because the chip was never able to really utilize that bandwidth.

It seems that a lot of work has been done on the RBEs as well. The Achilles’ heel of the R600 was its poor anti-aliasing performance due to its reliance on shader based color resolve. I do not yet know the details, but it appears that AMD has fixed this problem and we can expect much better AA performance. AMD may still be doing shader based color resolve, but apparently it is now highly optimized. When running without AA the HD 2900 XT was often able to compete with the 8800 GTX/Ultra in many applications, but once AA was turned on performance typically was brought down to the 8800 GTS level.

The chip will run around 800 MHz with fast GDDR-4 at the high end. We can expect this card to be around $300, which is cheaper than the current HD 2900 XT. It will also thoroughly spank the HD 2900 XT in overall performance as well as features. It will have the complete UVD unit, and implement SM 4.1 functionality. And it does it all with single slot cooling and a power draw of around 120 to 130 watts depending on the configuration. Some of the initial cards from other AIBs will likely features dual slot cooling, plus overclocked configurations. I also wouldn’t be surprised to see an 8 pin PCI-E version that will really clock up there. This looks to be the next high end for AMD for a while, until at least the R670 comes into play. From all indications the R670 is actually two RV670s on one PCB. Expect that card to come out early Q1 2008, right around the time NVIDIA will release its 8800 GX2 type product for the high end.

AMD took a chance on releasing a product on TSMC’s 55 nm process, and it looks like this gamble really paid off. NVIDIA is sticking with the more mature 65 nm process, but in this case their conservative bet did not look to pay off. 55 nm is about 90% the size of the 65 nm products, but for some reason TSMC added a few other features to the process and are expressing that designs will pull 10% to 20% less power according to Daily Tech. This gives AMD a little bit of an advantage in both size and power over competing NVIDIA designs. AMD stumbled with the R600, and the RV630/610 parts certainly did not impress many people either, but it appears as though AMD has righted the ship and the RV670 is going to be a pretty impressive product at its price point.

Launch of the RV670 appears to be on the same day as the launch of the AMD Phenom and RD790 chipset (and its derivatives). So reviewers will have their hand’s full getting the Phenom, motherboard, and accompanying graphics cards benchmarked and written up! This will be a huge day for AMD, and they are hoping that overall it will be thermonuclear explosion of information and performance figures.

Something that is quite telling about this launch is that AMD and its partners stopped sampling HD 2900 XT cards some time ago. A PR person from one of the partners was overheard saying, “Why would I want to sample anymore HD 2900s when the RV670 is so much faster and almost here?