Core 2 Quad - Q9300 / Q9450 / Q9550 / QX9650 / QX9770

[ath]

 

---

 

Yorkfield to takie jakby dwa polaczone ze soba Wolfdale'y, imponujaca wartosc cache L2 - 12mb, nowa magistrala 1333mhz, nowy proces 0,45nm i lepsza wydajnosc.

 

Garsc testow.

 

 

 

 

Edytowane 18 Listopada 2007 przez ath

[modman]

Wydajność zdumiewająca :) Ciekawe jak w grach sobie radzi :)

[Marcinas83]

Co na to AMD :lol2:?? Mam nadzieję, że fani zielonych już nie będą tak się przechwalać wyższością Phenoma :D

Edytowane 19 Sierpnia 2007 przez Marcinas83

[modman]

Ciekawe co na to AMD laugh.gif

O to to, Ciekawe, może nareszcie wypuszczą coś Lepszego od INTELA :)

Mam taką cichą nadzieje :D

[Gość Damikor]

:?

2xWolfdale

Szkoda, ze nie natywna 4 rdzeniowka :mur:

Edytowane 19 Sierpnia 2007 przez Damikor

[Gość Harry Lloyd]

Natywnej sie pewnie nie opłącało opracowywać jak za rok będzie Nehalem i zniknie FSB.

 

A swoją drogą te proce już się będą zwać po prostu "Core 2" i po tym model.

[victor89]

Doszło do tego że nie będzie porównań wydajności intel vs. AMD tylko starsze procki vs. Nowsze procki :D

[ath]

http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?p...268#post4386268

[Twój Pan]

http://forum.purepc.pl/index.php?showtopic=247138 ;)

[ath]

Recka Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 - http://pclab.pl/art29327.html

[Twój Pan]

Recki Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650:

 

@ AnandTech

@ VR-Zone

@ ExtremeTech

@ HardwareZone

@ Tom's Hardware

@ bit-tech

@ Legit Reviews

@ X-bit labs

@ Tech Report

@ FiringSquad

@ OCWorkbench

@ Techgage

@ PC Perspective

@ HotHardware

@ LostCircuits

@ [H] Enthusiast

@ Hexus

@ Tweaknews

@ Boot Daily

@ Madshrimps

@ Computerbase

@ CustomPC

@ Hardtecs4u

@ Reghardware

@ NeoSeeker

@ Fudzilla

[ath]

Na XS juz sie ostro bawia:

 

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=163822

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=163803

 

U nas nikt nie benciach!e ? ;]

[Twój Pan]

Na XS juz sie ostro bawia:

 

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=163822

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=163803

 

U nas nikt nie benciach!e ? ;]

W dziale sprzedam jeden lezy, moze chcesz kupic i sobie pobenchowac? :lol:

[ath]

QX9650 L739A644 + Blitz Extreme / X38-DQ6

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=166849

 

 

 

 

 

 

+88GT

 

 

 

---

 

Dzordz niezle pojechal. ;]

 

 

 

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpo...mp;postcount=66

Edytowane 30 Listopada 2007 przez ath

[Twój Pan]

Dzordz niezle pojechal. ;]

 

[.attachmentid=18089]

tak sobie ;)

 

http://www.coolaler.com.tw/coolalercbb/QX9650BOX/6059.gif

[ath]

Ide po szczeke do piwnicy. :D

[Kean]

Ide po szczeke do piwnicy. :D

Jeszcze nie wracaj :D

http://www.coolaler.com.tw/coolalercbb/QX9650BOX/6114.gif

Choć na XS niektórzy mówią że te wyniki coolalera to fake...

[Twój Pan]

Choć na XS niektórzy mówią że te wyniki coolalera to fake...

Na XS wszystkie wyniki lepsze od hipro = fake :lol: (z jednym malym wyjatkiem ;) )

[ath]

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 - Penryn już na FSB 1600 MHz @ PCLab

[cavarr]

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 benchmarks

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 is one of the lower-end quad-core processors Intel will launch next year. Q9300 runs at 2.5 GHz, but comes with only 6MB L2 cache. Intel slides have stated that the price of this piece of hardware will be around $270, is slated for arrival in January, and we can pretty much consider it the Q6600 of the next generation; a quad-core for the mid-range segment. Recently, overclocker Coolaler got a set of quad-cores sent over by some generous person and among them there was a Q9300. He was able to overclock it to 3.7GHz (495x7.5), SuperPi 1M stable with time of 13.532 seconds. He also ran some Everest memory benchmarks

Jak widać z najsłabszym Q penrynem nie jest już tak różowo :(, ważne że "więksi" bracia dają radę :D

 

New Yorkfields postponed until February

With AMD struggling with its TLB bug, Intel should be leaning back and enjoying the ride, but unfortunately, there seems to be trouble in Intel land as well. According to a report published at PCinpact.com, Yorkfield suffers from some slight problems too. Apparently the "integrity" of the FSB frequency is not satisfactory and may even cause crashes. They have been able to force the error in the lab, but haven't observed these problems out in the open. Wolfdale is not affected by this, but will arrive as planned in January.

zobaczymy

[wookie85]

Warto poczekac na Q9300 i czy da ona jakiegos kopa w porownaniu do Q6600 ?

[ath]

Jeszcze nie wracaj :D

http://www.coolaler.com.tw/coolalercbb/QX9650BOX/6114.gif

Choć na XS niektórzy mówią że te wyniki coolalera to fake...

19mhz wiecej. :D

 

 

---

 

Nie mam pytan. ;]

 

Edytowane 21 Grudnia 2007 przez ath

[Dimek]

Nie mam pytan. ;]

 

[zdjecie]

No to juz mozna jakas mini-selekcje zrobic... :) Edytowane 21 Grudnia 2007 przez Dimek

[cavarr]

19mhz wiecej. :D

 

 

---

Nie mam pytan. ;]

45nm od intela miażdży :D

Co do foty to nie są to Yorkfield tylko stare :wink: Q6600

 

edit

 

Intel Yorkfield Chip Delay Due To Board Issues: Report

Intel may delay the rollout of quad-core Yorkfield non-Extreme processors because of motherboard issues, according to a report at PC Watch (X-bit Labs also cited the report).

 

An Intel spokesperson responded this way: "All we are saying is Q1 for now, with more exact details at CES [Consumer Electronics Show]." Rumors have been circulating that Intel is delaying its Yorkfield non-Extreme processors strictly because, some theories go, competition from AMD has dwindled--due to quad-core Phenom and Barcelona delays--to the point that Intel saw no compelling reason to bring out new desktop processors.

 

Actually, there appears to be a more practical reason behind the delay of the Q9550, Q9450, Q9300 45-nanometer quad-core processors. Sources at Taiwan motherboard manufacturers are citing problems with the front-side bus (FSB) on certain boards that would use the Yorkfield non-Extreme processors. More specifically, mass-market four-layer boards, such as some P35-based boards, may have "noise" and stability issues, according to PC Watch which cited Taiwan motherboard vendors. High-end, six-layer boards, such as those that use the X38 chipset, do not appear to have any FSB issues, according to the report.

 

Consequently, high-end (six-layer) boards based on Intel's Extreme QX9650 do not have the issue, but lower-end boards using upcoming Yorkfield non-Extreme chips could potentially have issues. Apparently, Harpertown and dual-core Wolfdale boards do not have issues. Finally, what rumors and reports seem to be missing is that Intel is not necessarily intentionally delaying these processors because it believes that AMD is not competitive.

 

The more plausible reason is that Intel believes that it has breathing room to fix the issue because of the AMD Barcelona and Phenom delays. The Intel fix may take one to two months, according to reports.

 

UPDATE: Intel January 2008 Processor Launch: Highlights

Edytowane 23 Grudnia 2007 przez cavarr

[pmp]

4G 1.33V - AC :banana:

[rafa]

Ma ktos może więcej info o dacie wejścia nowych Quadów?

[marcin255A]

cos ktoś wie o batch ,udalo mi się znaleźć takie coś

 

co myślicie?

[nrl]

http://www.google.pl/search?hl=pl&q=L7...+Google&lr=

 

pozdro

 

gdzie znalazłeś :D

[marcin255A]

to akurat wiem tylko co z tego wynika -dobry batch>?

[lazYb0N]

Pomoc w tej kwestii to chyba uzyskasz tylko na anglojezycznych forach, bo watpie zeby duzo osob z forum mialo po kilka sztuk procow, zeby byc zdolnym do oceny czy dobry czy zly batch.

 

Moje 2 grosze.