Mało fps cs source

[ddebny]

Witam,

 

Mam 30fps w grze counter-strike source.

Ciężko grać na tylu fpsach.

 

Sprzęt to:

AMD Athlon 64 2000Mhz

2GB Ram DDR2

GeForce GT 430 1GB DDR3

Rozdzielczość w grze 1280x720

 

W czym może tkwić problem?

[zzizzy]

Grasz na najniższych detalach?

 

Powyłączaj programy w tle, sprawdź stabilność wszystkich podzespołów programami typu Orthos, Furmark (ale najpierw poczytaj, jak ich używać).

Edytowane 17 Lutego 2012 przez zzizzy

[ddebny]

Tak, minimalne detale.

 

Ok, przetestuję.

 

Program Orthos opcja "Blend - stress CPU and RAM"?

Na 6h wystarczy? :) Rozumiem, że przy zastopowaniu wyświetli mi jakiś raport?

Edytowane 17 Lutego 2012 przez ddebny

[zzizzy]

Nie, odpalasz do skutku. Pamiętaj o ustawieniu priorytetu na najwyższy (9).

[SzczYpior_n1]

Najwyższy priorytet nie jest wcale dobry. Optimum to 7 - 8.

[ddebny]

ok, czyli priorytet 8 i czekam aż sam się wyłączy?

[SzczYpior_n1]

Właśnie "do skutku" to dość pesymistyczne podejście, bo jak sprzęt będzie Ci działał stabilnie, to nie dożyjesz końca testu :lol: Tak, 6 godzin powinno styknąć...

[ddebny]

zostawiłem komputer włączony na noc.

O 6 rano gdy włączyłem monitor pojawił mi się panel do logowania windowsa(prawdopodobnie się zresetował).

 

Oto Logi:

 

Type: Blend - stress CPU and RAM Min: 8 Max: 4096 InPlace: No Mem: 1791 Time: 15

CPU: 2000MHz FSB: 200MHz [200MHz x 10.0 est.]

2012-02-17 21:53

Launching 1 thread...

1:Using CPU #0

1:Beginning a continuous self-test to check your computer.

1:Press Stop to end this test.

1:Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922943 using 1024K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19374367 using 1024K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19174369 using 1024K FFT length.

1:Self-test 1024K passed!

1:Test 1, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 8K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M163839 using 8K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M159745 using 8K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M157695 using 8K FFT length.

1:Self-test 8K passed!

1:Test 1, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M212991 using 10K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M210415 using 10K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M208897 using 10K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M204799 using 10K FFT length.

1:Self-test 10K passed!

1:Test 1, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432577 using 896K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432575 using 896K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17115073 using 896K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16815071 using 896K FFT length.

1:Self-test 896K passed!

1:Test 1, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942209 using 768K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942207 using 768K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155777 using 768K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155775 using 768K FFT length.

1:Self-test 768K passed!

1:Test 1, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M250519 using 12K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245759 using 12K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245281 using 12K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M243713 using 12K FFT length.

1:Self-test 12K passed!

1:Test 1, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M291913 using 14K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M286719 using 14K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M282625 using 14K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M280335 using 14K FFT length.

1:Self-test 14K passed!

1:Test 1, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12451841 using 640K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12451839 using 640K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12196481 using 640K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11796481 using 640K FFT length.

1:Self-test 640K passed!

1:Test 1, 7800 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M9961473 using 512K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 7800 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M9961471 using 512K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 7800 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M9837183 using 512K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 7800 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M9737185 using 512K FFT length.

1:Self-test 512K passed!

1:Test 1, 340000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M339487 using 16K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 340000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M335393 using 16K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 340000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M331681 using 16K FFT length.

1:Self-test 16K passed!

1:Test 1, 270000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M420217 using 20K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 270000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M409601 using 20K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 270000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M401407 using 20K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 270000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M393217 using 20K FFT length.

1:Self-test 20K passed!

1:Test 1, 9000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M8716289 using 448K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 9000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M8716287 using 448K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 9000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M8516289 using 448K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 9000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M8316287 using 448K FFT length.

1:Self-test 448K passed!

1:Test 1, 11000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M7471105 using 384K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 11000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M7471103 using 384K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 11000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M7377889 using 384K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 11000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M7277887 using 384K FFT length.

1:Self-test 384K passed!

1:Test 1, 210000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M501041 using 24K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 210000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M496943 using 24K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 210000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M487423 using 24K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 210000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M471041 using 24K FFT length.

1:Self-test 24K passed!

1:Test 1, 180000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M580673 using 28K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 180000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M573441 using 28K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 180000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M565247 using 28K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 180000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M557057 using 28K FFT length.

1:Self-test 28K passed!

1:Test 1, 13000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M6225921 using 320K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 13000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M6225919 using 320K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 13000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M6198241 using 320K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 13000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M6098239 using 320K FFT length.

1:Self-test 320K passed!

1:Test 1, 17000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M5120737 using 256K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 17000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M5030735 using 256K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 17000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4980737 using 256K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 17000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4980735 using 256K FFT length.

1:Self-test 256K passed!

1:Test 1, 160000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M662593 using 32K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 160000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M659457 using 32K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 160000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M655359 using 32K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 160000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M644399 using 32K FFT length.

1:Self-test 32K passed!

1:Test 1, 120000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M827279 using 40K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 120000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M819199 using 40K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 120000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M802817 using 40K FFT length.

1:Test 4, 120000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M795473 using 40K FFT length.

1:Self-test 40K passed!

1:Test 1, 19000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4501145 using 224K FFT length.

1:Test 2, 19000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4458143 using 224K FFT length.

1:Test 3, 19000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M4358145 using 224K FFT length.

1:Self-test 224K passed!

1:Test 1, 22000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M3835553 using 192K FFT length.

[kaijitsu]

 Pierwsze co to sprawdź temp procka i grafy - everest, speedfan etc. CS Source bo updacie silnika ma większe wymagania co do procka. Kiedys gralem na a64 3500+ i 1950pro i mialem 150fps a po update 50fps. Wprowadzili niby wielordzeniowość, która IMO wcale się nie sprawdza (/sprawdzała - nie wiem jak to teraz wygląda). 

Edytowane 18 Lutego 2012 przez kaijitsu

[Orgiusz]

Też się zastanawiam nad tym debilizmem. :mur:

Source przez kilka lat spasł się tak bardzo że platforma z czasów premiery pod wysokie detale teraz ledwo zipie. Autor ma słabiutką grafikę, słaby CPU i jedyne co go ratuje to cfg na cięcie grafiki ponad to co jest w opcjach.